Difference between revisions of "User talk:Vincent"

From Lazarus wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
But happily we are on the wikipedia world where you can revert changes that end up being considered negative. --[[User:Sekelsenmat|Sekelsenmat]] 02:02, 26 Oct 2005 (CEST)
 
But happily we are on the wikipedia world where you can revert changes that end up being considered negative. --[[User:Sekelsenmat|Sekelsenmat]] 02:02, 26 Oct 2005 (CEST)
 +
 +
Name changes done. Should we remove or leave the redirect pages? Nothing else links to them. --[[User:Sekelsenmat|Sekelsenmat]] 21:20, 1 Nov 2005 (CET)

Revision as of 21:20, 1 November 2005

sk:test page for lang

But there was nothing on that section. Just a note that it was part of a previous wiki. No authors were mentioned at all. Also, if you look at projects like Wikipedea you notice that it is much more professional to have a clean document. This kind of information can go to the discussion page and I copied the full content of the contributors section (only that small note) to the discussion page.

If you reply saing you are sure about the reversion I will do so. --Sekelsenmat 11:58, 24 Oct 2005 (CEST)

Ok, done. Thanks for sending me a message =) Communication is vital on group projects. --Sekelsenmat 12:18, 24 Oct 2005 (CEST)

Ok, I read your comments on the talk page and replyed to them. --Sekelsenmat 01:53, 26 Oct 2005 (CEST)

> soon = within 20 minutes? That is really soon.

I am a really impatient man =)

And noticing that Pepecito wrote that almost 2 months ago without replyes I just thought I should implement instead of the more wise and prudent "wait (2 months?) if anyone replyes to my reply".

But happily we are on the wikipedia world where you can revert changes that end up being considered negative. --Sekelsenmat 02:02, 26 Oct 2005 (CEST)

Name changes done. Should we remove or leave the redirect pages? Nothing else links to them. --Sekelsenmat 21:20, 1 Nov 2005 (CET)