Difference between revisions of "Merging Lazarus and FPC"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Bug tracker == | == Bug tracker == | ||
Not sure. --[[User:FPK|FPK]] 11:26, 15 Jan 2006 (CET) | Not sure. --[[User:FPK|FPK]] 11:26, 15 Jan 2006 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Good idea. With mantis you can easily define projects and move issues between projects. -- [[User:Vincent|Vincent]] 14:48, 15 Jan 2006 (CET) | ||
== Common core mailing list == | == Common core mailing list == | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 15 January 2006
The purpose of this page is to discuss how far Lazarus and FPC should be merged. This isn't a democratic vote but a place for the developers to collect their opinions.
Website
Yes. Avoids user confusion and reduces administration when it's done --FPK 11:26, 15 Jan 2006 (CET)
Forums
Yes. Saves administration work and makes it easier for users to find the right place to ask. --FPK 11:26, 15 Jan 2006 (CET)
Bug tracker
Not sure. --FPK 11:26, 15 Jan 2006 (CET)
Good idea. With mantis you can easily define projects and move issues between projects. -- Vincent 14:48, 15 Jan 2006 (CET)
Common core mailing list
No, creates too much noise. But introduce a new list lazarus-fpc-core for people being involved in things affecting both projects. --FPK 11:26, 15 Jan 2006 (CET)
Wiki
Yes, saves administration work --FPK 11:26, 15 Jan 2006 (CET)
Releases
No, requires too much coordination, already getting the FPC releases within a reasonable time frame is hard. --FPK 11:26, 15 Jan 2006 (CET)
