Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deploying Your Application"
From Lazarus wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
(detecting arch) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I have read that the gui of Iceberg is better than PackageMaker, but since I haven't used PackageMaker's nor Iceberg's gui, I cannot comment on that. | I have read that the gui of Iceberg is better than PackageMaker, but since I haven't used PackageMaker's nor Iceberg's gui, I cannot comment on that. | ||
[[User:Vincent|Vincent]] 09:22, 13 Feb 2006 (CET) | [[User:Vincent|Vincent]] 09:22, 13 Feb 2006 (CET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == detecting arch == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Lazarus build scripts detect arch in the folowing way: | ||
+ | rpm --eval '%{_arch}' |
Revision as of 10:44, 29 May 2006
An alternative to PackageMaker is Iceberg. I use this to create packages with remote access over an ssh connection (no gui). Advantages:
- it has a command line utility called 'freeze' to create the packages from the command line, so that package building can be automated.
- package file description is in xml format, so that it can be edited with any text editor.
I have read that the gui of Iceberg is better than PackageMaker, but since I haven't used PackageMaker's nor Iceberg's gui, I cannot comment on that. Vincent 09:22, 13 Feb 2006 (CET)
detecting arch
The Lazarus build scripts detect arch in the folowing way:
rpm --eval '%{_arch}'