Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deploying Your Application"
From Lazarus wiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchm |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An alternative to PackageMaker is [http://s.sudre.free.fr/Software/Iceberg.html Iceberg]. I use this to create packages with remote access over an ssh connection (no gui). | An alternative to PackageMaker is [http://s.sudre.free.fr/Software/Iceberg.html Iceberg]. I use this to create packages with remote access over an ssh connection (no gui). | ||
Advantages: | Advantages: | ||
| − | * it has a command line | + | * it has a command line utility called 'freeze' to create the packages from the command line, so that package building can be automated. |
* package file description is in xml format, so that it can be edited with any text editor. | * package file description is in xml format, so that it can be edited with any text editor. | ||
I have read that the gui of Iceberg is better than PackageMaker, but since I haven't used PackageMaker's nor Iceberg's gui, I cannot comment on that. | I have read that the gui of Iceberg is better than PackageMaker, but since I haven't used PackageMaker's nor Iceberg's gui, I cannot comment on that. | ||
[[User:Vincent|Vincent]] 09:22, 13 Feb 2006 (CET) | [[User:Vincent|Vincent]] 09:22, 13 Feb 2006 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 09:52, 10 May 2006
An alternative to PackageMaker is Iceberg. I use this to create packages with remote access over an ssh connection (no gui). Advantages:
- it has a command line utility called 'freeze' to create the packages from the command line, so that package building can be automated.
- package file description is in xml format, so that it can be edited with any text editor.
I have read that the gui of Iceberg is better than PackageMaker, but since I haven't used PackageMaker's nor Iceberg's gui, I cannot comment on that. Vincent 09:22, 13 Feb 2006 (CET)
