Talk:New IDE features since

@BigChimp: Why "v1.x (to be announced)" ? Those are for 1.2. Date and subversion are to be announced. The page lists features by Release, not by svn trunk date -- Martin
@Martin and BigChimp: Some native english speaker should tell us wehter it is "build in" or "built in". I would say that in this case the tense should be "present perfect" (see: http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/presentperfect.html), so "built in".

@Bart: " Why "v1.x (to be announced)" ?" I think you're confusing me with somebody else (Martin?). I don't remember making that edit. Feel free to do what you like ;) As for built in: well, I did make that change because the term *is* built in.... sorry, built-in (at least in the US): http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/built-in If anybody wants to change it back again though, be my guest. --BigChimp 16:25, 24 January 2014 (CET)

Sorry indeed, the Change I was looking at was by Juha, and I only meant to undo that. For some reason, I did not see the "buil[t/d] in" change. I apologize of having reverted that too. --Martin

In fact I can not figure out what has happened, or how. I went to the history page, selected the "undo" link, on the item I though was about the "to be announced" (but what ever item it may have been, definitely only ONE item, and only ONCE. So I expect to see my change to undo exactly one change. (I was satisfied to have done the right thing, when I saw the "to be announced" was back). And yet the ONE undo appears to have undone several changes. No idea why. --Martin

No problem, I was already wondering why you were so set on the Build... thing. Suggest removing this entire page now the misunderstanding is solved... --BigChimp 23:22, 25 January 2014 (CET)

As far as my "talk" goes feel free --Martin